Comment on Houston's arguments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Diagonal arguments and fixed points
A universal schema for diagonalization was popularized by N.S. Yanofsky (2003), based on a pioneering work of F.W. Lawvere (1969), in which the existence of a (diagonolized-out and contradictory) object implies the existence of a fixed-point for a certain function. It was shown that many self-referential paradoxes and diagonally proved theorems can fit in that schema. Here, we fi...
متن کاملOn Privacy and Partition Arguments
A function and f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) is said to be t-private if there exists a (randomized) communication protocol for computing f , such that no coalition of at most t participants can infer any additional information from the execution of the protocol other than what follows from their inputs and the value of f . It is known that every n-argument function f defined over finite domains can be...
متن کاملOn Detection of Erratic Arguments
Due to the erratic nature, the value of a function argument in one normal program execution could become illegal in another normal execution context. Attacks utilizing such erratic arguments are able to evade detections as fine-grained context information is unavailable in many existing detection schemes. In order to obtain such fine-grained context information, a precise model on the internal ...
متن کاملReal Arguments Are Approximate Arguments
There are a number of frameworks for modelling argumentation in logic. They incorporate a formal representation of individual arguments and techniques for comparing conflicting arguments. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair 〈Φ, α〉 where Φ is minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. However, real argument...
متن کاملOn resolving Conflicts between Arguments
Argument systems are based on the idea that one can construct arguments for propositions structured reasons justifying the belief in a proposition. Using defeasible rules, arguments need not be valid in all circumstances, therefore, it might be possible to construct an argument for a proposition as well as its negation. When arguments support conflicting propositions, one of the arguments must ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
سال: 1982
ISSN: 0022-5002
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-113